↓Skip to main content

BGP Inter-AS Options

·508 words·3 mins
lab1918
Author
lab1918

In the context of BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), inter-AS options are methods used to manage and exchange routing information between different Autonomous Systems (ASes). This is especially relevant in scenarios where multiple service providers or large organizations with separate ASes need to communicate. There are several standard methods for inter-AS routing with BGP, each with its unique characteristics and use cases.

BGP Inter-AS Options
#

  1. Option A: Inter-AS with Back-to-Back VRFs

    • Description: This is the simplest method, where two ASes connect via a direct link. Each provider edge (PE) router holds a VRF (Virtual Routing and Forwarding) instance for the customer.
    • Implementation: Customer routes are exchanged between the PEs over eBGP sessions. Each PE router has a VRF for each customer, and routing information is exchanged between these VRFs.
    • Use Case: Suitable for small-scale deployments where simplicity is preferred over scalability.

  2. Option B: Inter-AS with EBGP Redistribution

    • Description: In this option, eBGP is used to redistribute routes directly between the PE routers of different ASes.
    • Implementation: PE routers in different ASes establish eBGP sessions with each other to exchange VPN routes. This option requires more complex routing policies to ensure proper route advertisement and to prevent routing loops.
    • Use Case: Useful when direct control over routing policies is needed and when dealing with a moderate number of routes.

  3. Option C: Inter-AS with MP-eBGP

    • Description: This method involves using MP-eBGP (Multiprotocol BGP) for VPNv4 route exchange between ASes.
    • Implementation: Route Reflectors (RRs) or AS Border Routers (ASBRs) in each AS exchange VPNv4 routes. The actual customer traffic still transits through the core of each AS.
    • Use Case: Best suited for large-scale deployments where scalability and flexibility are required.

  4. Option D: Inter-AS with Carrier Supporting Carrier (CSC)

    • Description: Carrier Supporting Carrier is a specialized solution where one carrier (the backbone carrier) provides BGP transit services to another carrier (the customer carrier).
    • Implementation: The customer carrier’s PE routers peer with the backbone carrier’s PE routers. The backbone carrier provides transit for the customer carrier’s VPN traffic.
    • Use Case: Ideal for situations where a smaller carrier needs to extend its reach using the infrastructure of a larger carrier.

  5. Option AB: Hybrid Approach

    • Description: This is a hybrid method that combines aspects of Option A and Option B.
    • Implementation: It uses back-to-back VRFs for some connections and eBGP redistribution for others, depending on specific requirements.
    • Use Case: Useful in scenarios that require a mix of simplicity and control over routing policies.

Key Considerations
#

  • Scalability: Options A and B are less scalable compared to Option C.
  • Complexity: Option C is more complex but offers greater scalability and flexibility.
  • Control: Option B provides more control over routing policies.
  • Security and Isolation: Each option offers different levels of security and traffic isolation, which should be considered based on the specific network requirements.

Selecting the right BGP inter-AS option depends on the specific needs of the network, including scale, control, complexity, and existing infrastructure. Each option has its advantages and trade-offs, and often the choice is influenced by the relationship between the different autonomous systems involved.