↓Skip to main content

Spanning Tree Protocol

·1394 words·7 mins
lab1918
Author
lab1918

The Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) is a network protocol used in Layer 2 switching within the OSI model. Its primary function is to prevent loop conditions in a network with redundant paths. STP is crucial in complex networks where multiple paths exist between switches, as it ensures that there is no loop formation, which can cause a variety of problems like broadcast storms and multiple frame transmission.

Here’s how STP works:

  1. Electing a Root Bridge: When STP is initiated, the first step is to elect a single switch as the Root Bridge. This is the logical center of the network. The switch with the lowest Bridge ID (which combines the bridge priority and the MAC address) becomes the Root Bridge.

  2. Calculating the Shortest Path to Root Bridge: Once the Root Bridge is elected, each switch in the network calculates the shortest path to the Root Bridge. The cost of reaching the Root Bridge is determined by the sum of the link costs. Links with lower costs (indicating higher bandwidth) are preferred.

  3. Electing Root Ports and Designated Ports:

    • Root Port (RP): On every non-root bridge, the port with the lowest path cost to the Root Bridge becomes the Root Port.
    • Designated Port (DP): On each network segment, one port is elected as the Designated Port. This port has the lowest path cost to the Root Bridge on that segment. The Designated Port is responsible for forwarding frames onto the network segment.

  4. Blocking Redundant Paths: To prevent loops, STP places redundant paths in a blocking state. These paths remain inactive and do not forward traffic unless an active path fails, at which point STP recalculates the topology and activates a previously blocked path if it’s now required.

  5. Listening and Learning: After a port is designated as either Root Port or Designated Port, it goes through the listening and learning states. In the listening state, the port listens to BPDU (Bridge Protocol Data Unit) frames to make sure no loops occur on the network. In the learning state, the port begins to learn MAC addresses but still does not forward frames.

  6. Forwarding State: Once the listening and learning states are complete, the port transitions to the forwarding state. In this state, it forwards user frames and is fully participating in frame forwarding according to the STP topology.

  7. Handling Topology Changes: If there’s a change in the network topology (like a switch or link failure), STP recalculates the tree and transitions some blocked paths to forwarding mode to ensure all segments of the network remain reachable.

STP plays a critical role in maintaining a stable and loop-free network environment in Layer 2 switched networks. It allows for redundancy in the network design, which is essential for network reliability and uptime, while preventing the potential problems that can arise from this redundancy.

MST vs PVST
#

MST (Multiple Spanning Tree) and PVST (Per-VLAN Spanning Tree) are two different protocols used to manage spanning trees in network environments, specifically in the context of Ethernet networks. They are enhancements or variations of the standard Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) and are designed to provide greater flexibility and efficiency. Let’s take a closer look at each:

Multiple Spanning Tree (MST)
#

  1. Definition: MST, or Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol, is an advanced version of STP defined in IEEE 802.1s. It allows multiple spanning trees to be created within a single network. This is particularly useful in complex or large-scale networks.

  2. Functionality: MST works by creating instances of spanning trees for different VLANs (Virtual Local Area Networks). Each instance can have a different topology, allowing for efficient use of paths and redundancy for different VLANs. This is beneficial in environments where different VLANs have distinct traffic patterns.

  3. Efficiency: By allowing multiple spanning trees, MST can optimize the use of network resources. It prevents situations where some links are underutilized while others are overloaded.

  4. Compatibility and Scalability: MST is compatible with the original STP and RSTP (Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol). It’s also more scalable for large networks with multiple VLANs.

Per-VLAN Spanning Tree (PVST)
#

  1. Definition: PVST, and its more common version, PVST+, are Cisco proprietary protocols that extend the original STP. PVST allows a separate spanning tree for each VLAN, providing greater control over path selection for each VLAN’s traffic.

  2. Functionality: In a PVST network, each VLAN has its own spanning tree. This means that network administrators can optimize the forwarding path for each VLAN independently. For example, VLAN 10 can have a different spanning tree than VLAN 20, allowing for customized path selection and redundancy.

  3. Resource Utilization: PVST can lead to better utilization of link bandwidth since different VLANs can use different paths in the network, but it also requires more CPU and memory resources due to the need to maintain multiple spanning trees.

  4. Compatibility: Being a Cisco proprietary protocol, PVST is primarily supported on Cisco devices. It’s not a standard protocol like MST, so interoperability with equipment from other vendors can be limited.

Key Differences
#

  • Standard vs. Proprietary: MST is an IEEE standard, while PVST is Cisco proprietary.
  • Efficiency in Large Networks: MST tends to be more efficient in large networks with multiple VLANs due to its ability to group VLANs into a smaller number of spanning tree instances.
  • Resource Utilization: PVST may consume more resources as it maintains a separate spanning tree for each VLAN.

In summary, both MST and PVST are designed to optimize the use of network resources in VLAN environments, with MST offering a standardized approach for managing multiple spanning trees and PVST providing a more Cisco-centric solution with per-VLAN spanning tree control.

RSTP vs MSTP
#

The Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) and Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP) are both enhancements of the original Spanning Tree Protocol (STP), but they differ in their functionality, complexity, and use cases. Let’s explore the key differences:

Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) - IEEE 802.1w
#

  1. Purpose and Functionality:

    • RSTP was designed to provide faster convergence than the classic STP. It significantly reduces the time it takes for the network to recover from a failure (convergence time).
    • It introduces new port states and roles to speed up the transition of ports to the forwarding state.

  2. Improvements Over STP:

    • RSTP improves the STP’s original 30 to 50 seconds convergence time to a few seconds.
    • It uses three port states (discarding, learning, forwarding) instead of the original five, and two port roles (Alternate and Backup) in addition to the original three.

  3. Backward Compatibility:

    • RSTP is backward compatible with STP, meaning it can operate with switches running the original STP.

  4. Operation:

    • RSTP operates within a single spanning tree instance, regardless of the number of VLANs in the network.

Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP) - IEEE 802.1s
#

  1. Purpose and Functionality:

    • MSTP extends the capabilities of RSTP by allowing multiple spanning trees within a network, providing better resource utilization and load balancing.
    • It can group multiple VLANs into a single spanning tree instance, reducing the need for separate instances for each VLAN.

  2. Enhancements for VLAN Environments:

    • MSTP is particularly useful in environments with numerous VLANs. It allows for the creation of multiple spanning tree instances (MSTIs) for different sets of VLANs, optimizing the path for each VLAN group.

  3. Scalability and Efficiency:

    • By allowing multiple spanning trees, MSTP improves the scalability of the network and prevents the overloading of a single spanning tree instance with too many VLANs.
    • This grouping reduces the CPU load on network devices compared to running a separate spanning tree for each VLAN.

  4. Compatibility:

    • MSTP is compatible with RSTP and STP. It can interoperate with switches running these protocols.

Key Differences
#

  • Convergence Time: While both RSTP and MSTP offer faster convergence than STP, their primary difference lies in handling VLANs and spanning tree instances.
  • Spanning Tree Instances: RSTP works with a single spanning tree instance, while MSTP can create multiple instances for different groups of VLANs.
  • Network Scalability: MSTP is better suited for larger, VLAN-heavy networks due to its ability to efficiently manage multiple spanning trees.
  • Resource Optimization: MSTP optimizes the use of network resources better than RSTP in environments with multiple VLANs.

In summary, while RSTP focuses on faster convergence, MSTP adds the capability to efficiently manage multiple VLANs in large-scale networks. The choice between RSTP and MSTP largely depends on the size and complexity of the network, as well as the specific requirements for VLAN segmentation and path optimization.